Manifesto

active

Time Horizon

When your planning horizon is your bonus cycle, you literally cannot think certain thoughts. They are structurally inaccessible.

organisational fluencystrategytimefinancial services

Shell's Scenario Planning in the 1990s projected 30 years forward. Not only because oil develops over geological timescales, but because the managers involved found it easier to set aside personal career and lifestyle biases when the horizon was that far out. They could not see their own retirement packages in the frame. So they thought clearly. This is an insight about how incentive architecture corrupts cognition at the temporal level.

Key claims

  1. 1Quarterly reporting cycle and short planning horizons make certain thoughts structurally inaccessible.
  2. 2Wrong time horizons produce wrong thoughts, which produce wrong strategies, which produce wrong outcomes, which get blamed on execution.
  3. 3Organisations that operate on quarterly cycles, annual planning rhythms, and three-year transformation programmes are operating on a fundamentally different clock from their environment. That gap is not manageable. It is structural.
  4. 4Mark Zuckerberg and other leaders of privately held or founder-controlled organisations are the counterpoint. The absence of quarterly reporting obligations changes what is thinkable.

Tensions

  • The discipline of protecting space for work that compounds over years while still delivering in the short term. Both are real obligations.
  • The incentive architecture problem is not just wrong rewards. It is wrong time horizons producing wrong cognition.
All manifestos